Pandurang Shivram Kalane vs Laxman Ankush Labade Advocate - Phadnis M. R. — 40/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHAH230007472019
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
684/2019
Filing Date
02-11-2019
Registration No
40/2019
Registration Date
02-11-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurang Shivram Kalane
Adv. Gaikwad Z. T.
Respondent(s)
Laxman Ankush Labade Advocate - Phadnis M. R.
Bhanudas Pandurang Labade
Adv. Phadnis M. R.
Anjana Narayan Kale
Adv. Phadnis M. R.
Saraswati Sahebrao Gore
Adv. Phadnis M. R.
Hearing History
Judge: 11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 28-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition (Application No. 39) filed by the legal heirs of deceased plaintiff Pandurang Shivram Kalaane was allowed. The court ordered that the names of the deceased plaintiff's heirs be added to the case records with "deceased" notation against the plaintiff's name, and directed that the corrected copy of the claim be filed within the prescribed period. The defendant's opposition to the petition was rejected as the heirs' claim was found to be legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition (Application No. 39) filed by the legal heirs of deceased plaintiff Pandurang Shivram Kalaane was allowed. The court ordered that the names of the deceased plaintiff's heirs be added to the case records with "deceased" notation against the plaintiff's name, and directed that the corrected copy of the claim be filed within the prescribed period. The defendant's opposition to the petition was rejected as the heirs' claim was found to be legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts