Anil Tukaram Kate vs Tukaram Shivram Kate Advocate - Kshirsagar P. B. — 223/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230006752022
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
594/2022
Filing Date
29-06-2022
Registration No
223/2022
Registration Date
01-07-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
10-2nd Jt CJJD JMFC Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anil Tukaram Kate
Adv. Kalokhe S. S.
Rakhmabai Tukaram Kate
Adv. Kalokhe S. S.
Latabai Shivaji Nimbhore
Adv. Kalokhe S. S.
Manisha Subhash Wagaskar
Adv. Kalokhe S. S.
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Shivram Kate Advocate - Kshirsagar P. B.
Hirabai Tukaram Kate
Nitin Tukaram kate
Papesh Raosaheb Pathare
Hearing History
Judge: 10-2nd Jt CJJD JMFC Shrigonda
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Issues | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 07-02-2026 | Issues | |
| 08-01-2026 | Issues | |
| 08-12-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by the plaintiff for an interim injunction restraining the defendants from creating third-party interest in jointly-held properties was allowed. The court found that the plaintiffs (children of defendant no. 1 from his first marriage) established a prima facie case with an arguable claim to undivided shares in the suit properties, balance of convenience favoring them, and potential irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted. Defendants no. 1 to 3 are restrained from creating any third-party interest in the suit properties until disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by the plaintiff for an interim injunction restraining the defendants from creating third-party interest in jointly-held properties was allowed. The court found that the plaintiffs (children of defendant no. 1 from his first marriage) established a prima facie case with an arguable claim to undivided shares in the suit properties, balance of convenience favoring them, and potential irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted. Defendants no. 1 to 3 are restrained from creating any third-party interest in the suit properties until disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts