Alka Javahar Bhalagat vs Amrutlaa Bhagchad Gundecha Advocate - Gawali N. D. — 239/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230006112024
e-Filing Number
23-09-2024
Filing Number
482/2024
Filing Date
24-Sep-2024
Registration No
239/2024
Registration Date
27-Sep-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Alka Javahar Bhalagat
Adv. Kulkarni N. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amrutlaa Bhagchad Gundecha Advocate - Gawali N. D.
-
2.Kamlesh Tarachand Gandhi
-
3.Asmita Kishor Gugale
-
4.Subham Kishor Gugale
-
5.Prachi Kishor Gugale
-
6.Lilabai Popatlal Gugale
-
7.Dadasaheb Babasaheb Mohite
-
8.Mohan Bapurao Bagal
-
9.Uttam Bapurao Bagal
-
10.Namdeo Bapurao Bagal
-
11.Keshav Mohan Bagal
-
12.Sarika Keshav Bagal
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
23-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: Defendant No. 7's application to reject the plaint under Order VII, Rule 11(b) and (c) of the CPC, 1908, on grounds of improper valuation of relief and insufficient court fees, has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff properly valued the relief as partition (main relief) rather than declaration (consequential relief), and adequate stamp duty was paid accordingly under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
02-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
19-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
02-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
15-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
10-Dec-2025
Depositing Amount
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
26-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
Depositing Amount
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
24-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
06-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
27-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
13-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
04-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
04-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
06-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
03-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
16-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Jun-2025
Depositing Amount
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
05-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
28-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
25-Mar-2025
Steps_Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
01-Mar-2025
Steps_Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
03-Feb-2025
Steps_Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
06-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
03-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
15-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
30-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 239/2024
Summary: Defendant No. 7's application to reject the plaint under Order VII, Rule 11(b) and (c) of the CPC, 1908, on grounds of improper valuation of relief and insufficient court fees, has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff properly valued the relief as partition (main relief) rather than declaration (consequential relief), and adequate stamp duty was paid accordingly under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts