Balasaheb Zumbarrao Gholap vs Amol Suresh Gholap Advocate - Bhose S. K. — 234/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230005282021
Filing Number
511/2021
Filing Date
12-Aug-2021
Registration No
234/2021
Registration Date
12-Aug-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Balasaheb Zumbarrao Gholap
Adv. Gaikwad Z. T.
-
2.Zumbarrao Ananta Gholap
Adv. Bhoyate D. A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amol Suresh Gholap Advocate - Bhose S. K.
-
2.Vaibhav Suresh Gholap
Adv. Bhose S. K.
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
10-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
03-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
14-Jun-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
-
04-Jan-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
-
01-Nov-2023
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
-
08-Sep-2023
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
-
10-Jul-2023
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
-
24-Mar-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
04-Jan-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
12-Oct-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
12-Jul-2022
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
16-Apr-2022
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
07-Mar-2022
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
04-Jan-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary This civil suit (Civil Case No. 234/2021, Petition No. 5) involves a land ownership dispute in Shiggaon, Ahmednagar district. The petitioner (plaintiff) claims ownership of Plot No. 15 (0.89 hectares) and alleges that respondents (defendants) are unlawfully obstructing their possession and attempting encroachment on 43 acres of the adjacent Plot No. 18/1. Outcome: The court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish the required prima facie case and evidence of possession or obstruction. The court noted lack of documentary proof regarding the petitioner's ownership, boundary demarcation, and the alleged trespassing. The court held that merely asserting claims in the petition without supporting evidence is insufficient. Costs will be determined at the final disposal of the case. Order dated January 4, 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jan-2022
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
16-Dec-2021
Order on Exh
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
08-Dec-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
03-Dec-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Dec-2021
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
24-Nov-2021
Hearing Without W.S.
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
29-Oct-2021
Hearing Without W.S.
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
30-Sep-2021
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
16-Sep-2021
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
17-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 234/2021
Summary This civil suit (Civil Case No. 234/2021, Petition No. 5) involves a land ownership dispute in Shiggaon, Ahmednagar district. The petitioner (plaintiff) claims ownership of Plot No. 15 (0.89 hectares) and alleges that respondents (defendants) are unlawfully obstructing their possession and attempting encroachment on 43 acres of the adjacent Plot No. 18/1. Outcome: The court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish the required prima facie case and evidence of possession or obstruction. The court noted lack of documentary proof regarding the petitioner's ownership, boundary demarcation, and the alleged trespassing. The court held that merely asserting claims in the petition without supporting evidence is insufficient. Costs will be determined at the final disposal of the case. Order dated January 4, 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts