Balasaheb Zumbarrao Gholap vs Amol Suresh Gholap Advocate - Bhose S. K. — 234/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH230005282021

Evidence

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

511/2021

Filing Date

12-08-2021

Registration No

234/2021

Registration Date

12-08-2021

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda

Judge

11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38,

Petitioner(s)

Balasaheb Zumbarrao Gholap

Adv. Gaikwad Z. T.

Zumbarrao Ananta Gholap

Adv. Bhoyate D. A.

Respondent(s)

Amol Suresh Gholap Advocate - Bhose S. K.

Vaibhav Suresh Gholap

Adv. Bhose S. K.

Hearing History

Judge: 11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda

09-03-2026

Evidence

15-01-2026

Evidence

15-12-2025

Evidence

09-10-2025

Evidence

21-08-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

04-01-2022
Order on Exhibit

Summary This civil suit (Civil Case No. 234/2021, Petition No. 5) involves a land ownership dispute in Shiggaon, Ahmednagar district. The petitioner (plaintiff) claims ownership of Plot No. 15 (0.89 hectares) and alleges that respondents (defendants) are unlawfully obstructing their possession and attempting encroachment on 43 acres of the adjacent Plot No. 18/1. Outcome: The court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish the required prima facie case and evidence of possession or obstruction. The court noted lack of documentary proof regarding the petitioner's ownership, boundary demarcation, and the alleged trespassing. The court held that merely asserting claims in the petition without supporting evidence is insufficient. Costs will be determined at the final disposal of the case. Order dated January 4, 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This civil suit (Civil Case No. 234/2021, Petition No. 5) involves a land ownership dispute in Shiggaon, Ahmednagar district. The petitioner (plaintiff) claims ownership of Plot No. 15 (0.89 hectares) and alleges that respondents (defendants) are unlawfully obstructing their possession and attempting encroachment on 43 acres of the adjacent Plot No. 18/1. Outcome: The court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish the required prima facie case and evidence of possession or obstruction. The court noted lack of documentary proof regarding the petitioner's ownership, boundary demarcation, and the alleged trespassing. The court held that merely asserting claims in the petition without supporting evidence is insufficient. Costs will be determined at the final disposal of the case. Order dated January 4, 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case