Sampat tukaram pansare vs Balasaheb tukaram pansare — 261/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230005182025
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
03-09-2025
Filing Number
552/2025
Filing Date
04-09-2025
Registration No
261/2025
Registration Date
09-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sampat tukaram pansare
Adv. Kapse Varsha Dattatraya
Respondent(s)
Balasaheb tukaram pansare
Keshav balasaheb pansare
Nemichand balasaheb pansare
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 06-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by defendants no.1 to 3 to set aside the "No written statement" order has been allowed. The court set aside the default order and permitted the defendants to submit their written statement despite the one-month delay, finding the grounds justifiable. The defendants must pay Rs. 500/- cost to the plaintiff and submit their written statement to ensure the suit involving immovable property is decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by defendants no.1 to 3 to set aside the "No written statement" order has been allowed. The court set aside the default order and permitted the defendants to submit their written statement despite the one-month delay, finding the grounds justifiable. The defendants must pay Rs. 500/- cost to the plaintiff and submit their written statement to ensure the suit involving immovable property is decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts