Mahendra Tatyaba Deshmukh vs Manda Mahendra Deshmukh Advocate - Jathar A. C. — 88/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition
CNR: MHAH230005012024
e-Filing Number
30-07-2024
Filing Number
382/2024
Filing Date
30-Jul-2024
Registration No
88/2024
Registration Date
01-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahendra Tatyaba Deshmukh
Adv. Raut S. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manda Mahendra Deshmukh Advocate - Jathar A. C.
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
27-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
27-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
09-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
12-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
05-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
14-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
07-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
17-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
03-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
12-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
08-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
18-Jul-2025
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
04-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
SUMMARY: The petition (Petition No. 17) filed under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1), for divorce has been allowed/granted. The court found that although the respondent delayed filing the written statement beyond the prescribed period (30-90 days from summons), the delay was justified and condonable. The court determined that granting the written statement would allow the case to proceed on merits, serving justice better than dismissing it on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jul-2025
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
27-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
13-Jun-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
02-May-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
11-Apr-2025
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
26-Mar-2025
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
10-Feb-2025
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
01-Feb-2025
Ex-Parte Order
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
17-Jan-2025
Ex-Parte Order
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
20-Dec-2024
Notice_Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
15-Nov-2024
Notice_Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
11-Oct-2024
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
12-Sep-2024
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
-
02-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 88/2024
SUMMARY: The petition (Petition No. 17) filed under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1), for divorce has been allowed/granted. The court found that although the respondent delayed filing the written statement beyond the prescribed period (30-90 days from summons), the delay was justified and condonable. The court determined that granting the written statement would allow the case to proceed on merits, serving justice better than dismissing it on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts