Mahendra Tatyaba Deshmukh vs Manda Mahendra Deshmukh Advocate - Jathar A. C. — 88/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition
CNR: MHAH230005012024
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
30-07-2024
Filing Number
382/2024
Filing Date
30-07-2024
Registration No
88/2024
Registration Date
01-08-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahendra Tatyaba Deshmukh
Adv. Raut S. P.
Respondent(s)
Manda Mahendra Deshmukh Advocate - Jathar A. C.
Hearing History
Judge: 11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition (Petition No. 17) filed under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1), for divorce has been allowed/granted. The court found that although the respondent delayed filing the written statement beyond the prescribed period (30-90 days from summons), the delay was justified and condonable. The court determined that granting the written statement would allow the case to proceed on merits, serving justice better than dismissing it on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition (Petition No. 17) filed under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1), for divorce has been allowed/granted. The court found that although the respondent delayed filing the written statement beyond the prescribed period (30-90 days from summons), the delay was justified and condonable. The court determined that granting the written statement would allow the case to proceed on merits, serving justice better than dismissing it on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts