Mahendra Tatyaba Deshmukh vs Manda Mahendra Deshmukh Advocate - Jathar A. C. — 88/2024

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition

CNR: MHAH230005012024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

30-07-2024

Filing Number

382/2024

Filing Date

30-07-2024

Registration No

88/2024

Registration Date

01-08-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda

Judge

11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13,

Petitioner(s)

Mahendra Tatyaba Deshmukh

Adv. Raut S. P.

Respondent(s)

Manda Mahendra Deshmukh Advocate - Jathar A. C.

Hearing History

Judge: 11-Civil Judge Senior Division Shrigonda

10-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

27-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

27-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

04-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY: The petition (Petition No. 17) filed under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1), for divorce has been allowed/granted. The court found that although the respondent delayed filing the written statement beyond the prescribed period (30-90 days from summons), the delay was justified and condonable. The court determined that granting the written statement would allow the case to proceed on merits, serving justice better than dismissing it on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The petition (Petition No. 17) filed under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1), for divorce has been allowed/granted. The court found that although the respondent delayed filing the written statement beyond the prescribed period (30-90 days from summons), the delay was justified and condonable. The court determined that granting the written statement would allow the case to proceed on merits, serving justice better than dismissing it on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case