Bhausaheb Bajirao Mande vs Machindra Tulshiram Mande Advocate - Gaikwad Z. T. — 168/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230003912021
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
363/2021
Filing Date
01-07-2021
Registration No
168/2021
Registration Date
02-07-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
10-2nd Jt CJJD JMFC Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhausaheb Bajirao Mande
Adv. Zarad D. B.
Sandip Sarjerao Mande
Sunil Sarjerao Mande
Rakhamabai Sarjerao Mande
Ramesh Narayan Mande
Anil Narayan Mande
Adikabai Narayan Mande
Respondent(s)
Machindra Tulshiram Mande Advocate - Gaikwad Z. T.
Chhaya Ashok Bhise
Trimbak Tulshiram Mande
Kamal Tulshiram Mande
Hearing History
Judge: 10-2nd Jt CJJD JMFC Shrigonda
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: R.Mu.N. 168/2021 (Ahmednagar District Court) Outcome: Case dismissed (फेरपास नाही - "No further hearing"). The witness testimony of Machhindra Tulshiram Mande (defendant's witness) was recorded and cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel. The court found the cross-examination of the witness complete and proceeded to dismiss the case without requiring further proceedings. Key Issue: The case involved property dispute claims regarding land parcels and the distribution thereof among multiple parties, with disputes over prior cases (R.Mu.N. 218/1996 and 70/2013) and property registrations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: R.Mu.N. 168/2021 (Ahmednagar District Court) Outcome: Case dismissed (फेरपास नाही - "No further hearing"). The witness testimony of Machhindra Tulshiram Mande (defendant's witness) was recorded and cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel. The court found the cross-examination of the witness complete and proceeded to dismiss the case without requiring further proceedings. Key Issue: The case involved property dispute claims regarding land parcels and the distribution thereof among multiple parties, with disputes over prior cases (R.Mu.N. 218/1996 and 70/2013) and property registrations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts