Raghunath Lahanu Shinde vs Popat Govardhan Shinde Advocate - Mandage Dattatray T. — 131/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230003222019
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
335/2019
Filing Date
04-06-2019
Registration No
131/2019
Registration Date
11-06-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
2-Jt CJJD and JMFC Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raghunath Lahanu Shinde
Adv. Pathan A. G.
Respondent(s)
Popat Govardhan Shinde Advocate - Mandage Dattatray T.
Sachin Popat Shinde
Adv. Mandage Dattatray T.
Zumbar Govardhan Shinde
Adv. Mandage Dattatray T.
Mina Popat Shinde
Adv. Mandage Dattatray T.
Sandip Zumbar Shinde
Adv. Mandage Dattatray T.
Rekha Zumbar Shinde
Adv. Mandage Dattatray T.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt CJJD and JMFC Shrigonda
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 02-02-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 05-01-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 22-12-2025 | Defence Evidence | |
| 15-12-2025 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a land dispute case (Regular Appeal No. 131/2019) before the Sangli District Court involving ownership of agricultural plots (Gate Nos. 755 and 756) in Ghargaon. The court recorded testimony from the plaintiff (Satyapratijneshwar) and cross-examined him regarding land records and ownership claims. The judgment dated 15-12-2025 allowed the plaintiff's appeal and dismissed the defendant's counterclaim, with the court finding in favor of the plaintiff's possession and cultivation rights over the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a land dispute case (Regular Appeal No. 131/2019) before the Sangli District Court involving ownership of agricultural plots (Gate Nos. 755 and 756) in Ghargaon. The court recorded testimony from the plaintiff (Satyapratijneshwar) and cross-examined him regarding land records and ownership claims. The judgment dated 15-12-2025 allowed the plaintiff's appeal and dismissed the defendant's counterclaim, with the court finding in favor of the plaintiff's possession and cultivation rights over the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts