Baban Ashru Udamle vs Aapa Baba Udamle Advocate - Zarad D. B. — 109/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230003052023
e-Filing Number
23-03-2023
Filing Number
307/2023
Filing Date
06-Apr-2023
Registration No
109/2023
Registration Date
20-Apr-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Baban Ashru Udamle
Adv. Bhose S. K.
-
2.Laxman Shivaji Waghmare
Adv. Bhose S. K.
-
3.Sachin Shivaji Waghmare
Adv. Bhose S. K.
-
4.Jyoti Satish Pawar
Adv. Bhose S. K.
-
5.Kusum Shivaji Waghmare
Adv. Bhose S. K.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aapa Baba Udamle Advocate - Zarad D. B.
-
2.Vishwnath Baba Udamle
Adv. Zarad D. B.
-
3.Santosh Vishwanth Udamle
-
4.Dattu Ashru Udamle
-
5.Kiran Rohidas Udamle
-
6.Somnath Rohidas Udamle
Case History
-
29-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application filed by defendants no. 1 & 2 to set aside the "No written statement" order has been allowed. The court permitted them to submit their written statement despite a delay of over two years and four months, finding the grounds justifiable and considering the suit involves immovable property that should be decided on merit. The defendants are required to pay Rs. 2,000/- as cost to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Depositing Amount
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
02-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
20-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
17-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
08-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
20-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
16-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
15-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
15-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
02-Aug-2025
Appearance
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
26-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
09-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
09-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
03-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
24-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
20-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
14-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
27-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
28-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
20-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
19-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
08-Apr-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
27-Feb-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
12-Jan-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
23-Nov-2023
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
25-Oct-2023
Ex-Parte Order
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
11-Oct-2023
Written Statement
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
12-Sep-2023
Written Statement
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
04-Aug-2023
Written Statement
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
18-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
06-May-2023
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
-
03-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2023
Summary: The application filed by defendants no. 1 & 2 to set aside the "No written statement" order has been allowed. The court permitted them to submit their written statement despite a delay of over two years and four months, finding the grounds justifiable and considering the suit involves immovable property that should be decided on merit. The defendants are required to pay Rs. 2,000/- as cost to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts