Baban Ashru Udamle vs Aapa Baba Udamle Advocate - Zarad D. B. — 109/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230003052023
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
23-03-2023
Filing Number
307/2023
Filing Date
06-04-2023
Registration No
109/2023
Registration Date
20-04-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baban Ashru Udamle
Adv. Bhose S. K.
Laxman Shivaji Waghmare
Adv. Bhose S. K.
Sachin Shivaji Waghmare
Adv. Bhose S. K.
Jyoti Satish Pawar
Adv. Bhose S. K.
Kusum Shivaji Waghmare
Adv. Bhose S. K.
Respondent(s)
Aapa Baba Udamle Advocate - Zarad D. B.
Vishwnath Baba Udamle
Adv. Zarad D. B.
Santosh Vishwanth Udamle
Dattu Ashru Udamle
Kiran Rohidas Udamle
Somnath Rohidas Udamle
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Depositing Amount
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Depositing Amount | |
| 02-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by defendants no. 1 & 2 to set aside the "No written statement" order has been allowed. The court permitted them to submit their written statement despite a delay of over two years and four months, finding the grounds justifiable and considering the suit involves immovable property that should be decided on merit. The defendants are required to pay Rs. 2,000/- as cost to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by defendants no. 1 & 2 to set aside the "No written statement" order has been allowed. The court permitted them to submit their written statement despite a delay of over two years and four months, finding the grounds justifiable and considering the suit involves immovable property that should be decided on merit. The defendants are required to pay Rs. 2,000/- as cost to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts