Sarika Ganesh Galande vs Mithu Bhikaji Kutal — 80/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230002152021
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
195/2021
Filing Date
17-03-2021
Registration No
80/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
5-Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarika Ganesh Galande
Adv. Bhose S. K.
Respondent(s)
Mithu Bhikaji Kutal
Pramila Mithu Kutal
Sagar Mithu Kutal
Sudam Bhikaji Kutal
Adv. Acharya R. K.
Aabasaheb Alise Aaba Bhiku Alise Bhikaji Kutal
Adv. Acharya R. K.
Ganesh Aaba kutal
Mirabai Bhausaheb More
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
Awaiting Summons
Depositing Amount
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 16-01-2026 | Depositing Amount | |
| 15-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 13-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
The petition (Nirnay Divani Dawa Cr. 80/2021) is allowed with conditions. Defendant No. 7 is directed to pay costs of Rs. 1,500/- to the plaintiff, and the ex-parte order previously passed against Defendant No. 7 is recalled conditional upon this payment. The court found that while there was significant delay (approximately 2.5 years) in filing the affidavit, Defendant No. 7 is a necessary party to the case and deserves an opportunity to present her defense on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition (Nirnay Divani Dawa Cr. 80/2021) is allowed with conditions. Defendant No. 7 is directed to pay costs of Rs. 1,500/- to the plaintiff, and the ex-parte order previously passed against Defendant No. 7 is recalled conditional upon this payment. The court found that while there was significant delay (approximately 2.5 years) in filing the affidavit, Defendant No. 7 is a necessary party to the case and deserves an opportunity to present her defense on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts