Manohar Ramdas Mane vs Alka Bapu Karande — 42/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 15-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH230001042026

e-Filing Number

31-01-2026

Filing Number

106/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda

Judge

3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manohar Ramdas Mane

    Adv. BORUDE SAMIT SAYAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Alka Bapu Karande

  2. 2.Sonabai Bapu Karande

  3. 3.Anil Bapu Karande

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for status quo and directed the defendants to maintain the existing state of affairs by refraining from carrying further construction of their house until they submit their written statement and response to the temporary injunction application. The court found that allowing construction to continue would defeat the purpose of the suit seeking perpetual injunction to protect the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property, which he owns via a gift deed from his mother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

  13. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for status quo and directed the defendants to maintain the existing state of affairs by refraining from carrying further construction of their house until they submit their written statement and response to the temporary injunction application. The court found that allowing construction to continue would defeat the purpose of the suit seeking perpetual injunction to protect the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property, which he owns via a gift deed from his mother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case