Manohar Ramdas Mane vs Alka Bapu Karande — 42/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230001042026
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
31-01-2026
Filing Number
106/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manohar Ramdas Mane
Adv. BORUDE SAMIT SAYAJI
Respondent(s)
Alka Bapu Karande
Sonabai Bapu Karande
Anil Bapu Karande
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for status quo and directed the defendants to maintain the existing state of affairs by refraining from carrying further construction of their house until they submit their written statement and response to the temporary injunction application. The court found that allowing construction to continue would defeat the purpose of the suit seeking perpetual injunction to protect the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property, which he owns via a gift deed from his mother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for status quo and directed the defendants to maintain the existing state of affairs by refraining from carrying further construction of their house until they submit their written statement and response to the temporary injunction application. The court found that allowing construction to continue would defeat the purpose of the suit seeking perpetual injunction to protect the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property, which he owns via a gift deed from his mother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts