Daulat Kisan Pimpale vs Bapu Vitthal Bhujbal — 3/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHAH230000522025

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2025

Filing Number

60/2025

Filing Date

23-01-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

27-01-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda

Judge

3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38,

Petitioner(s)

Daulat Kisan Pimpale

Adv. Gaikwad R. Z.

Respondent(s)

Bapu Vitthal Bhujbal

Mira Navnath Pimpale

Adv. Bhos B. S.

Navnath Ashru Pimpale

Adv. Darekar Sunil G.

Bandu Ashru Pimpale

Adv. Darekar Sunil G.

Raju Ashru Pimpale

Gorakh Ashru Pimpale

Monika Navnath Pimpale

Adv. Darekar Sunil G.

Manisha Navnath Pimpale

Adv. Darekar Sunil G.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd- Jt Civil Judge S D Shrigonda

13-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

06-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

25-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

23-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Interim Orders

27-02-2026
Order on T.I.
23-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the application and set aside the ex-parte order against defendants 1, 5 & 6, and the "no written statement" order against defendants 2-4, 7 & 8. All defendants are now permitted to submit their written statements, as the court found the grounds justifiable and the suit involving immovable property requires decision on merit. The defendants must pay Rs. 1,600 as cost to the plaintiff (jointly or severally). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application and set aside the ex-parte order against defendants 1, 5 & 6, and the "no written statement" order against defendants 2-4, 7 & 8. All defendants are now permitted to submit their written statements, as the court found the grounds justifiable and the suit involving immovable property requires decision on merit. The defendants must pay Rs. 1,600 as cost to the plaintiff (jointly or severally). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case