Tai Dhananjay Dindore vs Dagadu Machhindra Kharat Advocate - Kshirsagar B. P. — 200233/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH220013872024

Filing Number

499/2024

Filing Date

03-Sep-2024

Registration No

200233/2024

Registration Date

05-Sep-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat

Judge

6-Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tai Dhananjay Dindore

    Adv. Anbhule J. S.

  2. 2.Dhananjay Gorakh Dindore

    Adv. Anbhule J. S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dagadu Machhindra Kharat Advocate - Kshirsagar B. P.

  2. 2.Raju Baban Shinde

  3. 3.Vikas Raju Rakshe

  4. 4.Dnyandev Bhaguji Bhise

  5. 5.Nitin Bapu Bhise

  6. 6.Aaba Nana Ughade

  7. 7.Vijay Uttam Mane

  8. 8.Jalindar Bhanudas Pawar

  9. 9.Bhanudas Ekanath Pawar

  10. 10.Gramvikas Adhikari,Grampanchayat Rakshaswadi Bk.

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary The court rejected all three interim injunction applications (Exh.5, 7, and 32) filed by plaintiffs Tai Dhananjay Dindore and spouse in their dispute over Grampanchayat property no.475 in Ahmednagar. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership and possession, noting they were not in physical possession of the property and that the property's status had allegedly changed through construction of shops before the suit was filed. Consequently, the applications for interim prohibitory injunction to restrain defendants from creating interests in the property, obstructing possession, or continuing construction were dismissed, with costs in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Citation

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Citation

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  11. 21-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    Citation

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  13. 10-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  14. 30-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  15. 21-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  16. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  17. 03-Jan-2026

    Citation

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  18. 15-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  19. 25-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  20. 15-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  21. 05-Nov-2025

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  22. 17-Oct-2025

    Report

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  23. 08-Oct-2025

    Report

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  24. 23-Sep-2025

    Report

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  25. 09-Sep-2025

    Report

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  26. 25-Jul-2025

    Report

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  27. 02-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  28. 24-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  29. 19-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  30. 05-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.civil Judgej.d. J.m.f.c.karjata'nagar

  31. 06-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 03-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200233/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected all three interim injunction applications (Exh.5, 7, and 32) filed by plaintiffs Tai Dhananjay Dindore and spouse in their dispute over Grampanchayat property no.475 in Ahmednagar. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership and possession, noting they were not in physical possession of the property and that the property's status had allegedly changed through construction of shops before the suit was filed. Consequently, the applications for interim prohibitory injunction to restrain defendants from creating interests in the property, obstructing possession, or continuing construction were dismissed, with costs in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case