Suresh Rambhau Jambhalkar vs Machhindra Tukaram Jambhalkar Advocate - Khetmalas A. R. — 209/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH220013452023
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
31-08-2023
Filing Number
257/2023
Filing Date
31-08-2023
Registration No
209/2023
Registration Date
01-09-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat
Judge
6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Rambhau Jambhalkar
Adv. Shewale K. S.
Haribhau Rambhau Jambhalkar
Adv. Shewale K. S.
Respondent(s)
Machhindra Tukaram Jambhalkar Advocate - Khetmalas A. R.
Balasaheb Bhaguji Jambhalkar
Adv. Khetmalas A. R.
Dnyandev Bhaguji Jambhalkar
Adv. Khetmalas A. R.
Dhondiba Laxman Jambhalkar
Adv. Khetmalas A. R.
Dashrath Tukaram Jambhalkar
Adv. Khetmalas A. R.
Yuvraj Balasaheb Jambhalkar
Adv. Khetmalas A. R.
Avinash Dhondiba Jambhalkar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Hearing on NFL Appln.
Report
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 27-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 18-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing on NFL Appln. | |
| 09-03-2026 | Report |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by defendants 1-6 seeking permission to file their written statement and temporary injunction application was allowed. The court permitted them to file the delayed pleadings subject to payment of costs of ₹500 to the plaintiffs, finding that while the reasons for delay were not genuine, fair trial principles necessitated giving defendants an opportunity to defend the suit concerning immovable property. The order is automatically set aside if defendants fail to comply by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by defendants 1-6 seeking permission to file their written statement and temporary injunction application was allowed. The court permitted them to file the delayed pleadings subject to payment of costs of ₹500 to the plaintiffs, finding that while the reasons for delay were not genuine, fair trial principles necessitated giving defendants an opportunity to defend the suit concerning immovable property. The order is automatically set aside if defendants fail to comply by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts