Trimurti G. B. S. S. P. Ltd. Kuldharan Branch Karjat vs Shivaji Haribhau Ghalme Advocate - Ghalme V.A. — 546/2021

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Compromise. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH220011462021

Compromise

Next Hearing

11th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1035/2021

Filing Date

10-06-2021

Registration No

546/2021

Registration Date

10-06-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat

Judge

6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Trimurti G. B. S. S. P. Ltd. Kuldharan Branch Karjat

Adv. Bhandari D. H.

Respondent(s)

Shivaji Haribhau Ghalme Advocate - Ghalme V.A.

Hearing History

Judge: 6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR

30-03-2026

Compromise

09-03-2026

Compromise

02-02-2026

Compromise

15-12-2025

Evidence

03-11-2025

Plea / Particulars

Interim Orders

15-12-2025
Plea

Case Summary A criminal case (FIR No. 546/2021) was filed against Shivaji Haribhau Ghalmey for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused issued a cheque for ₹2,79,067/- towards repayment of a loan of ₹2,00,000/- borrowed from Trimurti Rural Cooperative Credit Society, which was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds on 15.02.2021. The court recorded the charges against the accused on 15.12.2025 and the accused's statement was recorded independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary A criminal case (FIR No. 546/2021) was filed against Shivaji Haribhau Ghalmey for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused issued a cheque for ₹2,79,067/- towards repayment of a loan of ₹2,00,000/- borrowed from Trimurti Rural Cooperative Credit Society, which was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds on 15.02.2021. The court recorded the charges against the accused on 15.12.2025 and the accused's statement was recorded independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case