Sunanda Vijay Kshirsagar vs Piraji Deorao Sonwane Advocate - NIL — 141/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH220008902020
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
194/2020
Filing Date
05-09-2020
Registration No
141/2020
Registration Date
05-09-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat
Judge
6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunanda Vijay Kshirsagar
Adv. Dahiwalkar R. B.
Respondent(s)
Piraji Deorao Sonwane Advocate - NIL
Shantabai Piraji Sonwane
Vijay Piraji Sonwane
Sanjay @ Ganesh Piraji Sonwane
Hearing History
Judge: 6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 18-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 28-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 25-08-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case: Sunanda vs Piraji & Ors. (RCS No.141/2020) Outcome: The court rejected the joint application filed by the plaintiff and defendants for appointment of a court commissioner to fix boundaries of the suit property (Gat no.371). The court found that the property had already been measured with a report filed, and since the suit is solely for perpetual injunction (not possession recovery), the reasons for boundary fixation were improper and did not warrant a fresh commission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case: Sunanda vs Piraji & Ors. (RCS No.141/2020) Outcome: The court rejected the joint application filed by the plaintiff and defendants for appointment of a court commissioner to fix boundaries of the suit property (Gat no.371). The court found that the property had already been measured with a report filed, and since the suit is solely for perpetual injunction (not possession recovery), the reasons for boundary fixation were improper and did not warrant a fresh commission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts