Pavan Gorakh Khude vs Gorakh Sahebrao Khude Advocate - NIL — 200175/2025
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6, 8. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH220006832025
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
361/2025
Filing Date
07-05-2025
Registration No
200175/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat
Judge
8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pavan Gorakh Khude
Adv. Londhe Nitin G.
Priyanka Amit Ulhare
Adv. Londhe Nitin G.
Rekha Vijay Pawar
Adv. Londhe Nitin G.
Rupali Parmeshwar Navgire
Adv. Londhe Nitin G.
Respondent(s)
Gorakh Sahebrao Khude Advocate - NIL
Savita Gorakh Khude
Sahadev Nivrutti Dhumal
Navnath Vasant Dhumal
Machindra Sahebrao Khude
Ajay Kacharu Khude
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 08-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 25-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 18-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In R.C.S. No. 175/2025 (Pawan Khude Vs. Gorakh Khude), the court allowed the original plaintiffs' application to file a written statement to counter claim filed by defendant No. 4, despite acknowledging that their reasons for the delay were not genuine. The court permitted the filing in the interest of justice to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure a fair trial regarding the immovable property dispute. The plaintiffs were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500 to defendant No. 4 on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In R.C.S. No. 175/2025 (Pawan Khude Vs. Gorakh Khude), the court allowed the original plaintiffs' application to file a written statement to counter claim filed by defendant No. 4, despite acknowledging that their reasons for the delay were not genuine. The court permitted the filing in the interest of justice to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure a fair trial regarding the immovable property dispute. The plaintiffs were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500 to defendant No. 4 on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts