Lata Vinayak Madane vs Kashinath Sahadu Thombare Advocate - Wakade S. J. — 200071/2024

Case under Partition Act Section 4. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 15-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH220003942024

Filing Number

165/2024

Filing Date

02-Mar-2024

Registration No

200071/2024

Registration Date

05-Mar-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat

Judge

8-2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Partition Act Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lata Vinayak Madane

    Adv. Punde A. S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kashinath Sahadu Thombare Advocate - Wakade S. J.

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  3. 02-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  6. 13-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  7. 01-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  8. 03-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  10. 23-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  11. 25-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  12. 01-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  13. 05-Feb-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  14. 05-Feb-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    The court rejected the defendant's application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the plaintiff from alienating the disputed property. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in defendant's favor, and no irreparable injury, noting that the plaintiff's right to alienate her undivided share is protected under property law and the defendant's interests are safeguarded by the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 05-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  16. 20-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  17. 16-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 16-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  19. 06-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  20. 06-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  21. 23-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  22. 27-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  23. 09-May-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  24. 19-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.cjjd and JMFC, Karjat

  25. 06-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 02-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200071/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the defendant's application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the plaintiff from alienating the disputed property. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in defendant's favor, and no irreparable injury, noting that the plaintiff's right to alienate her undivided share is protected under property law and the defendant's interests are safeguarded by the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case