Lata Vinayak Madane vs Kashinath Sahadu Thombare Advocate - Wakade S. J. — 200071/2024

Case under Partition Act Section 4. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH220003942024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

165/2024

Filing Date

02-03-2024

Registration No

200071/2024

Registration Date

05-03-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat

Judge

8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT

Acts & Sections

Partition Act Section 4

Petitioner(s)

Lata Vinayak Madane

Adv. Punde A. S.

Respondent(s)

Kashinath Sahadu Thombare Advocate - Wakade S. J.

Hearing History

Judge: 8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

02-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

19-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

18-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-10-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

05-02-2025
Order on T.I.
05-02-2025
Order on T.I.

The court rejected the defendant's application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the plaintiff from alienating the disputed property. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in defendant's favor, and no irreparable injury, noting that the plaintiff's right to alienate her undivided share is protected under property law and the defendant's interests are safeguarded by the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the defendant's application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the plaintiff from alienating the disputed property. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in defendant's favor, and no irreparable injury, noting that the plaintiff's right to alienate her undivided share is protected under property law and the defendant's interests are safeguarded by the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case