Lata Vinayak Madane vs Kashinath Sahadu Thombare Advocate - Wakade S. J. — 200071/2024
Case under Partition Act Section 4. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH220003942024
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
165/2024
Filing Date
02-03-2024
Registration No
200071/2024
Registration Date
05-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat
Judge
8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lata Vinayak Madane
Adv. Punde A. S.
Respondent(s)
Kashinath Sahadu Thombare Advocate - Wakade S. J.
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 02-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 19-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 18-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 13-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
The court rejected the defendant's application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the plaintiff from alienating the disputed property. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in defendant's favor, and no irreparable injury, noting that the plaintiff's right to alienate her undivided share is protected under property law and the defendant's interests are safeguarded by the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the defendant's application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain the plaintiff from alienating the disputed property. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in defendant's favor, and no irreparable injury, noting that the plaintiff's right to alienate her undivided share is protected under property law and the defendant's interests are safeguarded by the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts