The State of Maharashtra. vs Tushar Sanjay Suryawanshi Advocate - Shinde Dhananjay v. — 31/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH220002542022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2022
Filing Number
197/2022
Filing Date
16-02-2022
Registration No
31/2022
Registration Date
17-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat
Judge
8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
51
Police Station
Karjat Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tushar Sanjay Suryawanshi Advocate - Shinde Dhananjay v.
Sanjay Bansi Suryawanshi
Kontabai Sanjay Suryawanshi
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 31/2022) from Karjat First Class Magistrate Court, Maharashtra, the court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of investigating officer Sunil Sampatrao Malshikare (witness no. 6). The investigating officer testified regarding the FIR registration, panchnama (site inspection report), seizure of weapons, and filing of a chargesheet against the accused based on sufficient evidence gathered during investigation. The cross-examination revealed certain procedural concerns raised by the defense regarding the investigation's conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 31/2022) from Karjat First Class Magistrate Court, Maharashtra, the court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of investigating officer Sunil Sampatrao Malshikare (witness no. 6). The investigating officer testified regarding the FIR registration, panchnama (site inspection report), seizure of weapons, and filing of a chargesheet against the accused based on sufficient evidence gathered during investigation. The cross-examination revealed certain procedural concerns raised by the defense regarding the investigation's conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts