Bhausaheb Aashraji Raut vs State of Mah. Thr.Mirajgaon Police Station Advocate - APP — 43/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH220001782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

31-01-2026

Filing Number

164/2026

Filing Date

02-02-2026

Registration No

43/2026

Registration Date

02-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat

Judge

6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

Mirajgaon Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,

Petitioner(s)

Bhausaheb Aashraji Raut

Adv. SHINDE DHANANJAY VISHWASRAO

Respondent(s)

State of Mah. Thr.Mirajgaon Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR

09-03-2026

Disposed

04-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

26-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

24-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

20-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Court Decision Summary The court rejected the applicant Bhausaheb Ashaji Raut's petition for interim custody of a seized tractor and trolley under Section 503 of the Indian Maritime Security Act 2023. The court found discrepancies between the vehicle descriptions in the initial FIR and the applicant's petition—specifically, differing chassis and engine numbers—which raised doubts about whether the seized property actually belonged to the applicant, making it impossible to establish legitimate ownership without further clarification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court rejected the applicant Bhausaheb Ashaji Raut's petition for interim custody of a seized tractor and trolley under Section 503 of the Indian Maritime Security Act 2023. The court found discrepancies between the vehicle descriptions in the initial FIR and the applicant's petition—specifically, differing chassis and engine numbers—which raised doubts about whether the seized property actually belonged to the applicant, making it impossible to establish legitimate ownership without further clarification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case