Bhausaheb Aashraji Raut vs State of Mah. Thr.Mirajgaon Police Station Advocate - APP — 43/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH220001782026
e-Filing Number
31-01-2026
Filing Number
164/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
43/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat
Judge
6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
Mirajgaon Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhausaheb Aashraji Raut
Adv. SHINDE DHANANJAY VISHWASRAO
Respondent(s)
State of Mah. Thr.Mirajgaon Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR
Disposed
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 26-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 20-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court rejected the applicant Bhausaheb Ashaji Raut's petition for interim custody of a seized tractor and trolley under Section 503 of the Indian Maritime Security Act 2023. The court found discrepancies between the vehicle descriptions in the initial FIR and the applicant's petition—specifically, differing chassis and engine numbers—which raised doubts about whether the seized property actually belonged to the applicant, making it impossible to establish legitimate ownership without further clarification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court rejected the applicant Bhausaheb Ashaji Raut's petition for interim custody of a seized tractor and trolley under Section 503 of the Indian Maritime Security Act 2023. The court found discrepancies between the vehicle descriptions in the initial FIR and the applicant's petition—specifically, differing chassis and engine numbers—which raised doubts about whether the seized property actually belonged to the applicant, making it impossible to establish legitimate ownership without further clarification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts