Raosaheb Deshmukh N. S. P. Ltd Rashin For Clerk Shumbham Anil Sake vs Prashant Walmik Kale — 46/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH220000972026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

91/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

46/2026

Registration Date

17-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat

Judge

8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

Raosaheb Deshmukh N. S. P. Ltd Rashin For Clerk Shumbham Anil Sake

Adv. NEWASE MAYUR UTTAM

Respondent(s)

Prashant Walmik Kale

Hearing History

Judge: 8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

20-01-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The State Public Grievance Redressal Court dismissed the complainant's petition under Section 19 of the Public Servants (Conduct) Rules, 1979. The court held that the accused employee cannot be held guilty based merely on the allegation and that evidence must substantiate any misconduct charges. The court directed the complainant to pursue the matter through appropriate legal channels and instructed that any further action be taken in accordance with established procedures and regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The State Public Grievance Redressal Court dismissed the complainant's petition under Section 19 of the Public Servants (Conduct) Rules, 1979. The court held that the accused employee cannot be held guilty based merely on the allegation and that evidence must substantiate any misconduct charges. The court directed the complainant to pursue the matter through appropriate legal channels and instructed that any further action be taken in accordance with established procedures and regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case