Raosaheb Deshmukh N. S. P. Ltd Rashin For Clerk Shumbham Anil Sake vs Prashant Walmik Kale — 46/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH220000972026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2026
Filing Number
91/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat
Judge
8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raosaheb Deshmukh N. S. P. Ltd Rashin For Clerk Shumbham Anil Sake
Adv. NEWASE MAYUR UTTAM
Respondent(s)
Prashant Walmik Kale
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd JT.CJJD and JMFC, KARJAT
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 20-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The State Public Grievance Redressal Court dismissed the complainant's petition under Section 19 of the Public Servants (Conduct) Rules, 1979. The court held that the accused employee cannot be held guilty based merely on the allegation and that evidence must substantiate any misconduct charges. The court directed the complainant to pursue the matter through appropriate legal channels and instructed that any further action be taken in accordance with established procedures and regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The State Public Grievance Redressal Court dismissed the complainant's petition under Section 19 of the Public Servants (Conduct) Rules, 1979. The court held that the accused employee cannot be held guilty based merely on the allegation and that evidence must substantiate any misconduct charges. The court directed the complainant to pursue the matter through appropriate legal channels and instructed that any further action be taken in accordance with established procedures and regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts