Devidas Namdev Girgune vs Navnath Rangnath Pansare Advocate - Wakade S. J. — 11/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 38. Status: Hearing on NFL Appln.. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH220000582023
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13/2023
Filing Date
10-01-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
11-01-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karjat
Judge
6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devidas Namdev Girgune
Adv. Kharat N. S.
Respondent(s)
Navnath Rangnath Pansare Advocate - Wakade S. J.
Kisanabai Rangnath Pansare
Adv. Wakade S. J.
Sarpanch, Grampanchayat Dhalwadi
Adv. Gaikwad S. R.
Gramsevak Grampanchayat Dhalwadi
Adv. Gaikwad S. R.
Dattu Dhondiba Girgune
Adv. Wakade S. J.
Ganpat Dhondiba Girgune
Adv. Wakade S. J.
Sampat Dhondiba Girgune
Adv. Wakade S. J.
Ambadas Namdev Girgune
Gayabai Raosaheb Pansare
Hirabai Namdev Girgune
Hearing History
Judge: 6-JT.CIVIL JUDGEJ.D. J.M.F.C.KARJATA'NAGAR
Hearing on NFL Appln.
Hearing on NFL Appln.
Hearing on NFL Appln.
Hearing on NFL Appln.
Hearing on NFL Appln.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Hearing on NFL Appln. | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing on NFL Appln. | |
| 27-01-2026 | Hearing on NFL Appln. | |
| 03-12-2025 | Hearing on NFL Appln. | |
| 14-11-2025 | Hearing on NFL Appln. |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the application filed by defendants no.1 and 2 seeking appointment of a court commissioner to measure the disputed agricultural land (Gat no.442/1) in Dhalwadi, Ahmednagar. The court held that the reasons for appointing a commissioner—to collect evidence regarding land measurement—were improper, as the main suit is for perpetual injunction (not possession recovery) and court commissioners cannot be appointed merely for evidence collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the application filed by defendants no.1 and 2 seeking appointment of a court commissioner to measure the disputed agricultural land (Gat no.442/1) in Dhalwadi, Ahmednagar. The court held that the reasons for appointing a commissioner—to collect evidence regarding land measurement—were improper, as the main suit is for perpetual injunction (not possession recovery) and court commissioners cannot be appointed merely for evidence collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts