Bharatbhushan Na. S. P. Ltd. Jamkhed vs Somnath Zumbar Khavle — 536/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138(A). Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAH210009582024
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
20-07-2024
Filing Number
772/2024
Filing Date
22-07-2024
Registration No
536/2024
Registration Date
23-07-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jamkhed
Judge
8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bharatbhushan Na. S. P. Ltd. Jamkhed
Adv. Pathan Ejajkhan A.
Respondent(s)
Somnath Zumbar Khavle
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 04-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 30-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 03-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court issued process against the accused Somnath Zumbar Khavle for committing an offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant's cheque dated 01/06/2024 was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a statutory notice on 21/06/2024, the accused failed to pay within the prescribed 15-day grace period. The court found prima-facie evidence of all essential ingredients of the offense and held the complaint to be within limitation and territorially competent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court issued process against the accused Somnath Zumbar Khavle for committing an offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant's cheque dated 01/06/2024 was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a statutory notice on 21/06/2024, the accused failed to pay within the prescribed 15-day grace period. The court found prima-facie evidence of all essential ingredients of the offense and held the complaint to be within limitation and territorially competent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts