Anuradha Arjun Thorat vs Vinayak Narayan Pawar — 120/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,38. Status: Report. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH210009012025
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
11-07-2025
Filing Number
171/2025
Filing Date
14-07-2025
Registration No
120/2025
Registration Date
14-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jamkhed
Judge
5-CIVIL JUDGE J.D.AND J.M.F.C. JAMKHED.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anuradha Arjun Thorat
Adv. Doke H. N.
Respondent(s)
Vinayak Narayan Pawar
Sarjerao Laxman Pawar
Bajirao Laxman Pawar
Kisanrao Laxman Pawar
Kalyan Laxman Pawar
Lilabai Dinkarrao Lekurwale
Kusum Ashok Surwase
Ahilyaji Baji Pawar
Chandrakant Bhaurao Pawar
Mahadev Shripati Bolbhat
Raosaheb Shripati Bolbhat
Shridhar Sahebrao Mule
Rambhau Yadav Mule
Nivrutti Yadav Mule
Gautam Kalyan Bolbhat
Alpana Kalyan Bolbhat
Kantabai Ashok Satpute
Namdev Narayan Pawar 18.
Suresh Namdev Pawar 18.
Vimal Dattatray Jadhav 18.
Simita Devidas Khod 18.
Mangal Laxman Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 5-CIVIL JUDGE J.D.AND J.M.F.C. JAMKHED.
Report
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Report | |
| 07-02-2026 | Steps_Unready | |
| 14-01-2026 | Steps_Unready | |
| 19-11-2025 | Steps_Unready | |
| 20-09-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary R.C.S. No. 120/2025 - Jamkhed Court Order (15/07/2025) The court adjourned the matter and issued notice to defendants No. 01 to 18D, directing them to show cause why a temporary injunction as sought by the plaintiff should not be granted, returnable on a date to be specified. The court found no urgency warranting immediate interim relief and deferred the decision pending hearing of all parties. E.P. and S.B. were allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary R.C.S. No. 120/2025 - Jamkhed Court Order (15/07/2025) The court adjourned the matter and issued notice to defendants No. 01 to 18D, directing them to show cause why a temporary injunction as sought by the plaintiff should not be granted, returnable on a date to be specified. The court found no urgency warranting immediate interim relief and deferred the decision pending hearing of all parties. E.P. and S.B. were allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts