Ankush Nath Gopalghare vs Venu Arvind Kale Other 2 Advocate - Kashid H. T. — 116/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 16,20,36,38. Status: Hearing Without W.S.. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH210005602022
Filing Number
161/2022
Filing Date
17-Jun-2022
Registration No
116/2022
Registration Date
17-Jun-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jamkhed
Judge
8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ankush Nath Gopalghare
Adv. Bora S. N.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Venu Arvind Kale Other 2 Advocate - Kashid H. T.
-
2.Tatyaram Tulshiram Savant
Adv. Kashid H. T.
-
3.Asaram Tulshiram Savant
Adv. Kashid H. T.
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
12-Jan-2026
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
17-Nov-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
13-Oct-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
20-Sep-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
02-Aug-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
01-Jul-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
09-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Court Order Summary Temporary Injunction Granted: The court allowed the plaintiff's application and granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants 1-3 from alienating agricultural land (Survey No. 10/2) in Ahmednagar district until final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case based on an oral agreement to sell 1 hectare of land for ₹8,00,000, with the plaintiff having paid ₹3,00,000 in installments and demonstrated readiness to complete the transaction, while defendants repeatedly delayed execution despite obtaining necessary government permissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
09-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
25-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
17-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
22-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
-
14-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.
-
03-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.
-
20-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.
-
29-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.
-
28-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.
-
22-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
15-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
20-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
22-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
16-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
08-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
06-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
25-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
21-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
03-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
01-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
03-Nov-2022
W.S. and Say
-
30-Aug-2022
W.S. and Say
-
22-Jul-2022
Awaiting Summons
-
18-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 116/2022
Court Order Summary Temporary Injunction Granted: The court allowed the plaintiff's application and granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants 1-3 from alienating agricultural land (Survey No. 10/2) in Ahmednagar district until final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case based on an oral agreement to sell 1 hectare of land for ₹8,00,000, with the plaintiff having paid ₹3,00,000 in installments and demonstrated readiness to complete the transaction, while defendants repeatedly delayed execution despite obtaining necessary government permissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts