H. U. Gugale Na. Sah. P. S. Ltd. Jamkhed vs Dinanath Bapurao Patil — 69/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138(A). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAH210001772025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2025
Filing Number
126/2025
Filing Date
12-02-2025
Registration No
69/2025
Registration Date
14-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jamkhed
Judge
8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
H. U. Gugale Na. Sah. P. S. Ltd. Jamkhed
Adv. Gole P. V.
Respondent(s)
Dinanath Bapurao Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 22-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 19-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court issued process (summons) against the accused for committing an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found prima facie that all essential ingredients of the offense were established: a cheque dated 22/12/2024 was dishonored due to insufficient funds, a mandatory notice was properly served on the accused on 10/01/2025, and the accused failed to pay within the stipulated 15-day grace period. The complaint was filed within the limitation period and the court has territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court issued process (summons) against the accused for committing an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found prima facie that all essential ingredients of the offense were established: a cheque dated 22/12/2024 was dishonored due to insufficient funds, a mandatory notice was properly served on the accused on 10/01/2025, and the accused failed to pay within the stipulated 15-day grace period. The complaint was filed within the limitation period and the court has territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts