Smita Rajendra Pawar vs Kacharu Kondiba Mule Other 1 Advocate - Bora N. L. — 44/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 29-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH210001542023

e-Filing Number

02-02-2023

Filing Number

58/2023

Filing Date

03-Feb-2023

Registration No

44/2023

Registration Date

03-Feb-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jamkhed

Judge

8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smita Rajendra Pawar

    Adv. Gole P. V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kacharu Kondiba Mule Other 1 Advocate - Bora N. L.

  2. 2.Chhaya Kacharu Mule

    Adv. Bora N. L.

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  11. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  12. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  13. 04-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The application filed by plaintiff Smita Rajendra Pawar under Order III, Rule 2(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to appoint her husband Rajendra Dinkar Pawar as her general power of attorney to conduct court proceedings was allowed. The court found that due to the plaintiff's illness, she is unable to attend regular court proceedings, and the power of attorney holder is duly authorized to make appearances and acts on her behalf in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  15. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  16. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  17. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  18. 14-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  19. 03-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 03-Feb-2025

    Depositing Amount

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed

  21. 06-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.

  22. 06-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.

  23. 14-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.

  24. 08-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.

  25. 15-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.d.and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed.

  26. 30-Mar-2024

    Hearing

  27. 19-Jan-2024

    Hearing

  28. 29-Nov-2023

    Hearing

  29. 21-Sep-2023

    Hearing

  30. 31-Jul-2023

    Hearing

  31. 16-Jun-2023

    Evidence

  32. 24-Mar-2023

    W.S. and Say

  33. 04-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 03-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by plaintiff Smita Rajendra Pawar under Order III, Rule 2(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to appoint her husband Rajendra Dinkar Pawar as her general power of attorney to conduct court proceedings was allowed. The court found that due to the plaintiff's illness, she is unable to attend regular court proceedings, and the power of attorney holder is duly authorized to make appearances and acts on her behalf in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case