Smita Rajendra Pawar vs Kacharu Kondiba Mule Other 1 Advocate - Bora N. L. — 44/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH210001542023
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2023
Filing Number
58/2023
Filing Date
03-02-2023
Registration No
44/2023
Registration Date
03-02-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jamkhed
Judge
8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smita Rajendra Pawar
Adv. Gole P. V.
Respondent(s)
Kacharu Kondiba Mule Other 1 Advocate - Bora N. L.
Chhaya Kacharu Mule
Adv. Bora N. L.
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by plaintiff Smita Rajendra Pawar under Order III, Rule 2(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to appoint her husband Rajendra Dinkar Pawar as her general power of attorney to conduct court proceedings was allowed. The court found that due to the plaintiff's illness, she is unable to attend regular court proceedings, and the power of attorney holder is duly authorized to make appearances and acts on her behalf in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by plaintiff Smita Rajendra Pawar under Order III, Rule 2(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to appoint her husband Rajendra Dinkar Pawar as her general power of attorney to conduct court proceedings was allowed. The court found that due to the plaintiff's illness, she is unable to attend regular court proceedings, and the power of attorney holder is duly authorized to make appearances and acts on her behalf in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts