Krishnabai Vikas Kambale and other 3 vs Jyoti Rupchand Dhende and other — 4/2020
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 387. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH210000622020
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2020
Filing Date
04-01-2020
Registration No
4/2020
Registration Date
04-01-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jamkhed
Judge
8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishnabai Vikas Kambale and other 3
Adv. Bhandari V. P.
Kalpana Bhagwan Chavan
Aruna Bhagwat Kharat
Rajesh Rupchand Dhende
Respondent(s)
Jyoti Rupchand Dhende and other
Ravindra Sitaram Dhende
Mahendra Sitaram Dhende
Sarswati Arjun Shirole
Naginbai Sitaram Dhende
Padminibai Laxman Dhende
Anita Ravindra Dhende
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jamkhed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 09-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 03-02-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 13-01-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 13-12-2025 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application to amend the plaint and implead three applicants (Maya Ravindar Jadhav, Chaya Kishor Gayakwad, and Rekha Santosh Mrudunge) as parties to an ancestral property dispute was allowed. The court found the applicants to be necessary parties as they are sisters of Defendant No. 1 and have undivided shares in the disputed property, and their presence is essential for complete and effective adjudication. The plaintiffs were directed to implead the applicants as Defendants No. 08 to 10 with necessary amendments to the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application to amend the plaint and implead three applicants (Maya Ravindar Jadhav, Chaya Kishor Gayakwad, and Rekha Santosh Mrudunge) as parties to an ancestral property dispute was allowed. The court found the applicants to be necessary parties as they are sisters of Defendant No. 1 and have undivided shares in the disputed property, and their presence is essential for complete and effective adjudication. The plaintiffs were directed to implead the applicants as Defendants No. 08 to 10 with necessary amendments to the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts