State of Maharastra vs Vasant Rambhau Phunde — 759/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHAH200020292025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-10-2025

Filing Number

1612/2025

Filing Date

01-10-2025

Registration No

759/2025

Registration Date

08-10-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

861

Police Station

PATHARDI POLICE STN.PATHARDI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharastra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vasant Rambhau Phunde

Rama Abhiman Shelar

Bhanudas Nathu Shelar

Adinath Suryabhan Budhwant

Satish Vilas Gavare

Raajoo Shankar Darakunde

Sanjay Dattatray Budhwant

Raajoo Navnath Shirasath

Karbhari Maaruti Marad

Rausaheb Vishnu Jadhav

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI

09-03-2026

Disposed

10-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In a gambling case under the Bombay Gambling Act, the court stopped proceedings against the accused under Section 281 of BNSS due to the accused's prolonged absence and the case remaining pending for an extended period. The accused was discharged, seized cash of Rs. 4,770 was ordered deposited to the Government, and remaining seized items were to be destroyed after the appeal period concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In a gambling case under the Bombay Gambling Act, the court stopped proceedings against the accused under Section 281 of BNSS due to the accused's prolonged absence and the case remaining pending for an extended period. The accused was discharged, seized cash of Rs. 4,770 was ordered deposited to the Government, and remaining seized items were to be destroyed after the appeal period concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case