State of Maharastra vs Vasant Rambhau Phunde — 759/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHAH200020292025

e-Filing Number

01-10-2025

Filing Number

1612/2025

Filing Date

01-Oct-2025

Registration No

759/2025

Registration Date

08-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

861

Police Station

PATHARDI POLICE STN.PATHARDI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharastra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasant Rambhau Phunde

  2. 2.Rama Abhiman Shelar

  3. 3.Bhanudas Nathu Shelar

  4. 4.Adinath Suryabhan Budhwant

  5. 5.Satish Vilas Gavare

  6. 6.Raajoo Shankar Darakunde

  7. 7.Sanjay Dattatray Budhwant

  8. 8.Raajoo Navnath Shirasath

  9. 9.Karbhari Maaruti Marad

  10. 10.Rausaheb Vishnu Jadhav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: In a gambling case under the Bombay Gambling Act, the court stopped proceedings against the accused under Section 281 of BNSS due to the accused's prolonged absence and the case remaining pending for an extended period. The accused was discharged, seized cash of Rs. 4,770 was ordered deposited to the Government, and remaining seized items were to be destroyed after the appeal period concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  4. 10-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 759/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In a gambling case under the Bombay Gambling Act, the court stopped proceedings against the accused under Section 281 of BNSS due to the accused's prolonged absence and the case remaining pending for an extended period. The accused was discharged, seized cash of Rs. 4,770 was ordered deposited to the Government, and remaining seized items were to be destroyed after the appeal period concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case