The State of Maharashtra vs Pramdo Gorakh Nale Advocate - Andhale S. K. — 462/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHAH200019522021
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1505/2021
Filing Date
26-11-2021
Registration No
462/2021
Registration Date
26-11-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
FIR Details
FIR Number
480
Police Station
PATHARDI POLICE STN.PATHARDI
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pramdo Gorakh Nale Advocate - Andhale S. K.
Bashir Jafar Pathan
Sohel Shahajadali Shaikh
Hanumanat @ Hanya Bansi Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 01-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 03-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-09-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary In Regular Criminal Case No. 462/2021, the First Class Magistrate at Pathardi, Ahmednagar heard the examination-in-chief of witness no. 01 (Prayagabai Arjun Dahiphale, 62 years old) on 23.09.2025. The witness testified regarding a panchanama (official record) prepared at the crime scene on 04.07.2020. The court examination concluded and cross-examination by the defense counsel was permitted. The case proceedings were adjourned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Regular Criminal Case No. 462/2021, the First Class Magistrate at Pathardi, Ahmednagar heard the examination-in-chief of witness no. 01 (Prayagabai Arjun Dahiphale, 62 years old) on 23.09.2025. The witness testified regarding a panchanama (official record) prepared at the crime scene on 04.07.2020. The court examination concluded and cross-examination by the defense counsel was permitted. The case proceedings were adjourned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts