Rekha Vyankatrao Garje vs Gramsevak Grampanchayat karyalaya Advocate - NIL — 282/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 09th March 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH200014842023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

367/2023

Filing Date

16-09-2023

Registration No

282/2023

Registration Date

16-09-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi

Judge

3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATHARDI

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Rekha Vyankatrao Garje

Adv. Pandhare D. C.

Respondent(s)

Gramsevak Grampanchayat karyalaya Advocate - NIL

Jyoti Ganesh Khade

Adv. NIL

Arati Hemant VAnve

Adv. NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATHARDI

09-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

Arguments

11-02-2026

Arguments

29-01-2026

Arguments

07-01-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court decreed the suit for declaration of civil death and heirship filed by Rekha Garje. The court found that her son Manoj Vyankatrao Garje has been missing since 01.05.2007 and declared him civilly dead with effect from 02.05.2014. The court also declared that the plaintiff, her two daughters (defendants 2 and 3), are the legal heirs of the missing son, enabling the plaintiff to obtain family pension benefits for her livelihood and medical needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

03-11-2025
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court decreed the suit for declaration of civil death and heirship filed by Rekha Garje. The court found that her son Manoj Vyankatrao Garje has been missing since 01.05.2007 and declared him civilly dead with effect from 02.05.2014. The court also declared that the plaintiff, her two daughters (defendants 2 and 3), are the legal heirs of the missing son, enabling the plaintiff to obtain family pension benefits for her livelihood and medical needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case