Ashok Eknath Mhaske vs Vitthal Mamtaji Mhaske Advocate - Welde V. D. — 200414/2014
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH200012892014
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200507/2014
Filing Date
02-09-2014
Registration No
200414/2014
Registration Date
03-09-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Eknath Mhaske
Adv. Shaikh L. I.
Machchhindra Eknath Mhaske
Adv. Sanap S. B.
Respondent(s)
Vitthal Mamtaji Mhaske Advocate - Welde V. D.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 23-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 02-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 02-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 10-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Ashok Eknath Mhaske & 1 other vs. Vitthal Mamtaji Mhaske (RCS No. 414/2014) Outcome: The court granted the temporary injunction application and restrained the defendant from alienating his share in the suit property until final disposal of the case. The judge found a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiffs, with balance of convenience favoring them, and determined that irreparable loss would result if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Ashok Eknath Mhaske & 1 other vs. Vitthal Mamtaji Mhaske (RCS No. 414/2014) Outcome: The court granted the temporary injunction application and restrained the defendant from alienating his share in the suit property until final disposal of the case. The judge found a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiffs, with balance of convenience favoring them, and determined that irreparable loss would result if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts