The State of Maharashtra vs Dnyaneshwar Bhausaheb Sanap — 249/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHAH200009582024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

726/2024

Filing Date

17-05-2024

Registration No

249/2024

Registration Date

17-05-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

288

Police Station

PATHARDI POLICE STN.PATHARDI

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Dnyaneshwar Bhausaheb Sanap

Balasaheb Bhanudas Bendre

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI

09-03-2026

Disposed

29-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

29-07-2025

Awaiting Summons

03-04-2025

Awaiting Summons

17-12-2024

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court discharged the accused Dnyaneshwar in a case under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding no reason to continue proceedings due to the absence of a Complaint Affidavit report. The proceedings were stopped under Section 258 of the CrPC, and seized liquor bottles were ordered destroyed while Rs. 500 cash was credited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused Dnyaneshwar in a case under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding no reason to continue proceedings due to the absence of a Complaint Affidavit report. The proceedings were stopped under Section 258 of the CrPC, and seized liquor bottles were ordered destroyed while Rs. 500 cash was credited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case