Ashrabai Babasaheb Ghule vs Bhagwan Ashruba Ghule Advocate - सातपुते सी. एन. — 151/2019

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 5,10,22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH200007882019

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200/2019

Filing Date

17-06-2019

Registration No

151/2019

Registration Date

17-06-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi

Judge

3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATHARDI

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 5,10,22

Petitioner(s)

Ashrabai Babasaheb Ghule

Adv. Bhabad M. D

Respondent(s)

Bhagwan Ashruba Ghule Advocate - सातपुते सी. एन.

Bansi Tatya Ghule

Laxman Tatya Ghule

Mohan Waman Ghule

Balasaheb Wanam Ghule

Narayan Jagannath Ghule

Latabai Sambhaji Dagadkhair

Ajinath Raghunath Ghule

Bhagwat Raghunath Ghule

Dwarkabai Kisan Shekde

Tulsabai Mahadeo Garje

Muktabai Vishnu Khedkar

Sindubai Bhaskar Andhale

Sunitabai Shahadeo Khedkar

Laxmibai Raghunath Ghule

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATHARDI

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

20-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

09-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

11-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Ready

15-11-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

Interim Orders

20-11-2019
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Ashrabai Ghule Vs. Bhagwan Ghule + 14 (Reg.C.S No. 151 of 2019) The court allowed the application for condonation of delay filed by defendants No. 1, 3, and 4. The delay in filing the written statement/say on record was condoned, allowing the defendants to file their response despite missing the original deadline due to unavailability of relevant documents and information. The court found no deliberate delay and decided the matter in favor of the defendants in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Ashrabai Ghule Vs. Bhagwan Ghule + 14 (Reg.C.S No. 151 of 2019) The court allowed the application for condonation of delay filed by defendants No. 1, 3, and 4. The delay in filing the written statement/say on record was condoned, allowing the defendants to file their response despite missing the original deadline due to unavailability of relevant documents and information. The court found no deliberate delay and decided the matter in favor of the defendants in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case