State of Maharastra vs Kanif Baburao Aathre — 156/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 185,177. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAH200005122025
Filing Number
383/2025
Filing Date
19-Mar-2025
Registration No
156/2025
Registration Date
19-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1273
Police Station
PATHARDI POLICE STN.PATHARDI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharastra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kanif Baburao Aathre
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Pathardi JMFC court discharged accused Kanif Aathare from charges under Sections 185 and 177 of the Motor Vehicles Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS. The discharge was ordered because the accused had been absent for an extended period and the prosecution failed to secure his presence through summons or warrants, making it improper to keep the case pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi
-
28-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi
-
30-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi
-
02-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi
-
13-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi
-
10-May-2025
First Order
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi
-
22-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 156/2025
The Pathardi JMFC court discharged accused Kanif Aathare from charges under Sections 185 and 177 of the Motor Vehicles Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS. The discharge was ordered because the accused had been absent for an extended period and the prosecution failed to secure his presence through summons or warrants, making it improper to keep the case pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts