State of Maharastra vs Arvind Fulsingh Rathod — 153/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185,177. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHAH200005092025

Filing Number

380/2025

Filing Date

19-Mar-2025

Registration No

153/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi

Judge

3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

780

Police Station

PATHARDI POLICE STN.PATHARDI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185,177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharastra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arvind Fulsingh Rathod

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Pathardi J.M.F.C. court discharged accused Arvind Rathod from offences under Sections 185 and 177 of the Motor Vehicle Act and stopped the proceeding under Section 281 of BNSS. The court found that since the accused had been absent for an extended period and prosecution failed to secure his presence through summons or warrants, continuing the case lacked propriety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  5. 30-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  6. 02-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  7. 13-May-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  8. 10-May-2025

    First Order

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  9. 22-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 19-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 153/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Pathardi J.M.F.C. court discharged accused Arvind Rathod from offences under Sections 185 and 177 of the Motor Vehicle Act and stopped the proceeding under Section 281 of BNSS. The court found that since the accused had been absent for an extended period and prosecution failed to secure his presence through summons or warrants, continuing the case lacked propriety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case