Shrimant Nivrutti Bade vs Bhimabai Digambar Bade Advocate - Kate A. S. — 64/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,37,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH200003972021
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
93/2021
Filing Date
02-03-2021
Registration No
64/2021
Registration Date
02-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shrimant Nivrutti Bade
Adv. Bawane V. R.
Respondent(s)
Bhimabai Digambar Bade Advocate - Kate A. S.
Shital Digambar Bade
Adv. Kate A. S.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 09-09-2025 | Evidence | |
| 02-07-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In the property dispute case Shrimant v. Bhimabai (R.C.S. No. 64/2021), the court allowed the defendants' application to condone the delay in filing their written statement. The court accepted that the delay due to unavailability of documents and Covid-19 lockdown warranted consideration in the interest of justice, and imposed costs of Rs. 100 on the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In the property dispute case Shrimant v. Bhimabai (R.C.S. No. 64/2021), the court allowed the defendants' application to condone the delay in filing their written statement. The court accepted that the delay due to unavailability of documents and Covid-19 lockdown warranted consideration in the interest of justice, and imposed costs of Rs. 100 on the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts