Sagar Devidas Thokal vs P I Pathardi Police Station Advocate - APP — 69/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHAH200003562026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
261/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
69/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sagar Devidas Thokal
Adv. SHAIKH LATIF ISMAIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.P I Pathardi Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed Sagar Devidas Thokal's application for interim custody of his seized motorcycle under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, finding him to be the registered owner and not an accused in the crime. The court ordered release of the motorcycle upon execution of a Rs. 1,00,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that he cannot sell or transfer it without court permission and must produce it when directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi
-
23-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi
-
16-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi
-
12-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 69/2026
The court allowed Sagar Devidas Thokal's application for interim custody of his seized motorcycle under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, finding him to be the registered owner and not an accused in the crime. The court ordered release of the motorcycle upon execution of a Rs. 1,00,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that he cannot sell or transfer it without court permission and must produce it when directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts