Satish Dnyadev Markad vs P I Pathardi Police Station Advocate - APP — 68/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHAH200003512026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
256/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
68/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATHARDI
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satish Dnyadev Markad
Adv. SHINDE PUNJARAM RABHAJI
Respondent(s)
P I Pathardi Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATHARDI
Disposed
Arguments
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed Satish Markad's application for interim custody of his seized Mahindra Scorpio vehicle, rejecting the prosecution's argument that it was needed as trial evidence. The court ordered release of the vehicle on an ₹8 lakh bond with conditions: the applicant cannot sell, mortgage, or alter the vehicle, must produce it on demand, and cannot use it for criminal purposes again. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed Satish Markad's application for interim custody of his seized Mahindra Scorpio vehicle, rejecting the prosecution's argument that it was needed as trial evidence. The court ordered release of the vehicle on an ₹8 lakh bond with conditions: the applicant cannot sell, mortgage, or alter the vehicle, must produce it on demand, and cannot use it for criminal purposes again. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts