Gaurav Chandrakant Akolkar MNG Ashabai Chandrakant Akolkar vs Chandrakant Gitaram Akolkar Advocate - NIL — 47/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,37. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH200003332022

Filing Number

74/2022

Filing Date

17-Feb-2022

Registration No

47/2022

Registration Date

17-Feb-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gaurav Chandrakant Akolkar MNG Ashabai Chandrakant Akolkar

    Adv. Waybhase N. A.

  2. 2.Ashabai Chandrakant Akolkar

    Adv. Waybhase N. A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandrakant Gitaram Akolkar Advocate - NIL

  2. 2.Dipali Kishor Dhonde

    Adv. NIL

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  3. 20-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  4. 21-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  5. 07-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  6. 08-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  7. 19-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  8. 30-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  9. 20-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  10. 06-May-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  11. 15-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  12. 10-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  13. 21-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  14. 13-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  15. 20-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  16. 22-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  17. 08-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  18. 12-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  19. 26-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  20. 29-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  21. 18-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  22. 30-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  23. 26-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  24. 16-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  25. 08-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  26. 18-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  27. 07-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  28. 26-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  29. 06-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  30. 30-Jan-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  31. 06-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  32. 09-Oct-2023

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  33. 20-Sep-2023

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  34. 03-Aug-2023

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  35. 15-Jul-2023

    Dismissal Order

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  36. 04-Jul-2023

    Dismissal Order

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  37. 08-Jun-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  38. 30-Apr-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  39. 18-Apr-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  40. 31-Mar-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The application for temporary injunction was allowed. The court restrained Defendant No. 1 from creating any third-party interest in the ancestral joint family agricultural property until final decision of the partition suit. The court found that plaintiffs established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted. Parties are directed to proceed with the suit expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  41. 31-Mar-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  42. 23-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  43. 02-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  44. 14-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  45. 23-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  46. 04-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  47. 08-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  48. 19-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  49. 12-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  50. 13-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Pathardi

  51. 24-Aug-2022

    Steps

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  52. 26-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  53. 13-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  54. 11-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Pathardi

  55. 17-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 17-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application for temporary injunction was allowed. The court restrained Defendant No. 1 from creating any third-party interest in the ancestral joint family agricultural property until final decision of the partition suit. The court found that plaintiffs established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted. Parties are directed to proceed with the suit expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case