Gaurav Chandrakant Akolkar MNG Ashabai Chandrakant Akolkar vs Chandrakant Gitaram Akolkar Advocate - NIL — 47/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,37. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH200003332022
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
74/2022
Filing Date
17-02-2022
Registration No
47/2022
Registration Date
17-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gaurav Chandrakant Akolkar MNG Ashabai Chandrakant Akolkar
Adv. Waybhase N. A.
Ashabai Chandrakant Akolkar
Adv. Waybhase N. A.
Respondent(s)
Chandrakant Gitaram Akolkar Advocate - NIL
Dipali Kishor Dhonde
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 21-11-2025 | Arguments | |
| 07-10-2025 | Arguments | |
| 08-09-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for temporary injunction was allowed. The court restrained Defendant No. 1 from creating any third-party interest in the ancestral joint family agricultural property until final decision of the partition suit. The court found that plaintiffs established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted. Parties are directed to proceed with the suit expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for temporary injunction was allowed. The court restrained Defendant No. 1 from creating any third-party interest in the ancestral joint family agricultural property until final decision of the partition suit. The court found that plaintiffs established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted. Parties are directed to proceed with the suit expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts