The State of Maharashtra vs Parashuram Mahadeo Advocate - Batule J. T. — 1700091/2011
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406420120b109. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHAH200003132011
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1700091/2011
Filing Date
07-04-2011
Registration No
1700091/2011
Registration Date
07-04-2011
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
FIR Details
FIR Number
I12
Police Station
Pathardi
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Parashuram Mahadeo Advocate - Batule J. T.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In this extortion case (FIR No. 91/2011), the court examined witness testimony from Ashok Mahalkar regarding alleged extortion of Rs. 40 lakhs by Accused No. 1, with subsequent settlement at Rs. 30 lakhs and a bank mortgage of Rs. 15 lakhs. The examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the witness were completed on 02.04.2026, with no further examination required. The case proceedings were recorded and the witness statement was accepted by the First Class Judicial Magistrate at Pathardi, Ahmednagar district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In this extortion case (FIR No. 91/2011), the court examined witness testimony from Ashok Mahalkar regarding alleged extortion of Rs. 40 lakhs by Accused No. 1, with subsequent settlement at Rs. 30 lakhs and a bank mortgage of Rs. 15 lakhs. The examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the witness were completed on 02.04.2026, with no further examination required. The case proceedings were recorded and the witness statement was accepted by the First Class Judicial Magistrate at Pathardi, Ahmednagar district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts