Appasaheb Gangadhar Shinde vs P I Pathardi Police Station Advocate - APP — 59/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHAH200003002026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
209/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
59/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Appasaheb Gangadhar Shinde
Adv. SHINDE PUNJARAM RABHAJI
Respondent(s)
P I Pathardi Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of Rs. 1,00,000 seized by Police Station Pathardi to the applicant Appasaheb Gangadhar Shinde till conclusion of trial. The court found the applicant was entitled to the seized amount as he is the victim (not an accused), the accused remained untraced, and no purpose was served by police custody, while both the prosecution and the third party (Balasaheb Asaram Solas) had no objection to release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of Rs. 1,00,000 seized by Police Station Pathardi to the applicant Appasaheb Gangadhar Shinde till conclusion of trial. The court found the applicant was entitled to the seized amount as he is the victim (not an accused), the accused remained untraced, and no purpose was served by police custody, while both the prosecution and the third party (Balasaheb Asaram Solas) had no objection to release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts