Rupali Goraksha Mhaske vs P I Pathardi Police Station Advocate - APP — 7/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHAH200000472026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
22/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rupali Goraksha Mhaske
Adv. FUNDE SANDIP BHANUDAS
Respondent(s)
P I Pathardi Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C PATHARDI
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 22-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-01-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Pathardi Judicial Magistrate dismissed Rupali's application filed under Section 503 BNSS in default for want of prosecution. The applicant was consistently absent and failed to take necessary steps despite the application pending for a long time, with her advocate confirming she had no interest in proceeding. The proceedings have been closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Pathardi Judicial Magistrate dismissed Rupali's application filed under Section 503 BNSS in default for want of prosecution. The applicant was consistently absent and failed to take necessary steps despite the application pending for a long time, with her advocate confirming she had no interest in proceeding. The proceedings have been closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts