Sindhubai Vinayak Deshmukh vs Chandrakala Gulab Deshmukh Advocate - पठाडे ए. एन. — 1700004/2010

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH200000112010

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1700004/2010

Filing Date

04-01-2010

Registration No

1700004/2010

Registration Date

04-01-2010

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi

Judge

3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATHARDI

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 37,38

Petitioner(s)

Sindhubai Vinayak Deshmukh

Adv. जायभाय एन. बी.

Vikas Vinayak Deshmukh

Prakash Vinayak Deshmukh

Respondent(s)

Chandrakala Gulab Deshmukh Advocate - पठाडे ए. एन.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PATHARDI

10-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

21-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

07-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

22-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

Interim Orders

19-10-2013
Order Number 1
30-08-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court allowed the petition for amendment filed by plaintiff Sindhubai Deshmukh under CPC Order 6 Rule 17. The plaintiff sought to amend the plaint to include additional details regarding property demarcation that were mentioned in a surveyor's report (Memorandum No. 330/2022) but were absent from the original suit. The court found that the proposed amendment does not alter the fundamental nature of the suit, aids in proper adjudication, and does not prejudice the defendant. The plaintiff is required to file the corrected plaint within 14 days and pay court fees, with cost fixed at Rs. 200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petition for amendment filed by plaintiff Sindhubai Deshmukh under CPC Order 6 Rule 17. The plaintiff sought to amend the plaint to include additional details regarding property demarcation that were mentioned in a surveyor's report (Memorandum No. 330/2022) but were absent from the original suit. The court found that the proposed amendment does not alter the fundamental nature of the suit, aids in proper adjudication, and does not prejudice the defendant. The plaintiff is required to file the corrected plaint within 14 days and pay court fees, with cost fixed at Rs. 200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pathardi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case