The State Maharashtra Through Shevgaon Po.St. vs Vasim Yasin Shaikh and Other — 305/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506,34,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH190019062023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1388/2023
Filing Date
13-10-2023
Registration No
305/2023
Registration Date
13-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon
Judge
3-2ND Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
928
Police Station
SHEVGAON POLICE STATION SHEVGAON
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Maharashtra Through Shevgaon Po.St.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vasim Yasin Shaikh and Other
Yasin Hasan Shaikh
Shaida Yasin Shaikh
Altaf Yasin Shaikh
Samina Sadik Pathan
Sadik Tayyab Pathan
Tayyab Gulab Pathan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2ND Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 14-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Shevgaon acquitted all seven accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 498(a), 323, 504, 506, and 34 on March 10, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations of dowry harassment, cruelty, and intimidation against the complainant, as the two prosecution witnesses contradicted the case narrative and suggested a settlement had occurred between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Shevgaon acquitted all seven accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 498(a), 323, 504, 506, and 34 on March 10, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations of dowry harassment, cruelty, and intimidation against the complainant, as the two prosecution witnesses contradicted the case narrative and suggested a settlement had occurred between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts