Ganesh Balasaheb Chavan vs Bapurao Baburao Chavan Advocate - Landepatil L. H. — 438/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 5. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH190018852023
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
10-10-2023
Filing Number
514/2023
Filing Date
10-10-2023
Registration No
438/2023
Registration Date
10-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon
Judge
3-2ND Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Balasaheb Chavan
Adv. Waghumbare P. V.
Pradip Balasaheb Chavan
Adv. Waghumbare P. V.
Sunita Balasaheb Chavan
Adv. Waghumbare P. V.
Respondent(s)
Bapurao Baburao Chavan Advocate - Landepatil L. H.
Devidas Baburao Chavan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2ND Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 16-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 01-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No. 1 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order was allowed. The court set aside the order dated 03.08.2024 and permitted the defendant to file their written statement, considering that valuable property rights were at stake and the defendant deserved a fair opportunity to contest the suit on merit. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 300 as cost to the plaintiff to compensate for the 10-month delay in filing the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No. 1 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order was allowed. The court set aside the order dated 03.08.2024 and permitted the defendant to file their written statement, considering that valuable property rights were at stake and the defendant deserved a fair opportunity to contest the suit on merit. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 300 as cost to the plaintiff to compensate for the 10-month delay in filing the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts