The State Maharashtra Through Shevgaon Po.St. vs Rohidas Mohan Kanthale — 371/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 309,186,187,188. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH190012212022
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
835/2022
Filing Date
29-07-2022
Registration No
371/2022
Registration Date
29-07-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon
Judge
3-2ND Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
SHEVGAON POLICE STATION SHEVGAON
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Maharashtra Through Shevgaon Po.St.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rohidas Mohan Kanthale
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2ND Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 16-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In case S.C.C. 371/2022 (State v. Rohidas), the court completed examination of Witness No. 2 for the prosecution on 09.03.2026. The witness testified regarding a panchanama (official record) prepared during a police investigation on 11.02.2022 regarding an alleged incident, and identified a seized bottle as evidence. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's credibility, and the witness retracted certain statements. The court accepted the testimony and closed examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In case S.C.C. 371/2022 (State v. Rohidas), the court completed examination of Witness No. 2 for the prosecution on 09.03.2026. The witness testified regarding a panchanama (official record) prepared during a police investigation on 11.02.2022 regarding an alleged incident, and identified a seized bottle as evidence. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's credibility, and the witness retracted certain statements. The court accepted the testimony and closed examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts