Kesharbai Chandrakant Kambale vs Chandrakant Yadav Kambale Advocate - Welde S. A. — 84/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH190008022021

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

616/2021

Filing Date

24-06-2021

Registration No

84/2021

Registration Date

24-06-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon

Judge

1-The Jt. Civil Judge JD JMFC Shevgaon

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 125

Petitioner(s)

Kesharbai Chandrakant Kambale

Adv. Batule D. T.

Respondent(s)

Chandrakant Yadav Kambale Advocate - Welde S. A.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-The Jt. Civil Judge JD JMFC Shevgaon

09-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

19-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

05-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

03-10-2025
Evidence
12-02-2026
Evidence

Case Summary Criminal Case No. 84/2021, Nishani 78 (Ahmednagar Court) This is a witness examination record in a criminal case. The Bank of Maharashtra (Kurkana Branch) manager testified regarding the bank account statements of the defendant, confirming pension deposits of Rs. 22,097/- monthly and an account balance of Rs. 23,405/- as of December 31, 2025. During cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged the witness's personal knowledge of account transactions, and the witness acknowledged lacking specific details about fund transfers and account operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Criminal Case No. 84/2021, Nishani 78 (Ahmednagar Court) This is a witness examination record in a criminal case. The Bank of Maharashtra (Kurkana Branch) manager testified regarding the bank account statements of the defendant, confirming pension deposits of Rs. 22,097/- monthly and an account balance of Rs. 23,405/- as of December 31, 2025. During cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged the witness's personal knowledge of account transactions, and the witness acknowledged lacking specific details about fund transfers and account operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case