Sanjay Laxman Ubale vs Tarachand Dadaba Ubale Advocate - Thorat M. V. — 149/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH190006512025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
04-04-2025
Filing Number
187/2025
Filing Date
05-04-2025
Registration No
149/2025
Registration Date
05-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon
Judge
2-The Civil Judge JD JMFC SHEVGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Laxman Ubale
Adv. Chemate B. B.
Respondent(s)
Tarachand Dadaba Ubale Advocate - Thorat M. V.
Sanjivani Tarachand Ubale
Adv. Thorat M. V.
Somnath Tarachand Ubale
Adv. Thorat M. V.
Vaijinath Tarachand Ubale
Adv. Thorat M. V.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-The Civil Judge JD JMFC SHEVGAON
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 09-02-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 06-01-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 18-11-2025 | W.S. and Say | |
| 15-10-2025 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Summary The case (Civil Regular Petition No. 149/2025) has been referred to a special 90-day mediation/conciliation process following directions from the Supreme Court of India and National Legal Services Authority. The court ordered that all proceedings remain strictly confidential, and any settlement agreement reached must be executed in writing with signatures from both parties and their advocates before being submitted to the court for final orders. The parties are directed to appear before the appointed mediator with valid identification, relevant documents, and their advocates on the specified date and time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The case (Civil Regular Petition No. 149/2025) has been referred to a special 90-day mediation/conciliation process following directions from the Supreme Court of India and National Legal Services Authority. The court ordered that all proceedings remain strictly confidential, and any settlement agreement reached must be executed in writing with signatures from both parties and their advocates before being submitted to the court for final orders. The parties are directed to appear before the appointed mediator with valid identification, relevant documents, and their advocates on the specified date and time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts