Swanadi Abhishek Patekar MNG Laxmi Abhishek Patekar vs Kakasaheb Bhanudas Patekar — 110/2026
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6,8. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH190005212026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
142/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon
Judge
1-The Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Shevgaon
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Swanadi Abhishek Patekar MNG Laxmi Abhishek Patekar
Adv. Labade A. R.
-
2.Laxmi Abhishek Patekar
Adv. Labade A. R.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kakasaheb Bhanudas Patekar
-
2.Chaya Kakasaheb Patekar
-
3.Abhishek Kakasaheb Patekar
-
4.Priyanka Prasad Adhav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court disposed of a partition and property possession suit between Swanandi Patekar and Kakasaheb Patekar by approving a compromise deed agreed upon by both parties. The court issued a decree based on the settlement terms and directed notification to the Registering Officer under Section 89-A of the Registration Act, 1908. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
The Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Shevgaon
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Order
The Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Shevgaon
-
17-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
The Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Shevgaon
-
13-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
The Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Shevgaon
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 110/2026
The court disposed of a partition and property possession suit between Swanandi Patekar and Kakasaheb Patekar by approving a compromise deed agreed upon by both parties. The court issued a decree based on the settlement terms and directed notification to the Registering Officer under Section 89-A of the Registration Act, 1908. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts